AI takes flight to revolutionise forest monitoring

Credit: Emily Lines – Eastern Finland
Emily Lines and Harry Owen setting up their scanning drone in a forest in eastern finland
Dr Emily Lines and Dr Harry Owen in Eastern Finland

Data collected by Lines and her team from across Europe, along with other public forest data, is being used to train the AI model. Owen has undergone the lengthy process of manually labelling more than 50 million data points in a single plot – separating them into individual trees ‘leaf’ and ‘wood’ elements. This manual labelling is used to train the AI model to create a 3D map based on laser-scanned data.

The pair hope that their 3D-model algorithm will speed up the forest monitoring pipeline, going from raw data to 3D models to key ecological measures without needing much expertise.

Data visualisation based on drone data collected from a forest in Europe

Owen’s 3D algorithm can identify individual trees, which are shown in different colours, revealing how each tree is growing, its structure and biomass. 

The team can use this data to determine essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) – such as ecosystem function and structure, genetic diversity and population abundance. EBVs act as indicators for biodiversity success in certain areas.

Forest-light tracing algorithm developed by Owen.

Owen is then using this 3D data to understand how light is scattered throughout the forests ecosystem. He has developed a further algorithm which highlights areas of direct sunlight and shade within the forest.

Intercepted light within the forest creates microhabitats in shaded areas. These may be beneficial to particular species in very dry or hot places.

Microhabitats are essential for species biodiversity within the forest. The team hopes that understanding where they are located will help to inform how they can be better protected.

In order to use AI to accurately process the large amount of complex and dense data for modelling individual trees, Owen had to build their own algorithm from scratch.

The intricacies of nature require an AI model that is trained on rich high-quality data. By using fewer samples, but of higher resolution data (instead of more samples of lower quality data) they are reducing unnecessary computer-processing power and cutting the environmental impact of training the model. 

Owen is also accounting for different types of forests, not just in European regions. He hopes that users across the world can harness the AI model to speed up the processing of data, from tropical to boreal forests.

The pair hope this AI model will accelerate forestry data processing, providing stronger evidence for improved policies and programmes for carbon accounting and biodiversity credits.